4.6 Article

Distribution of normal saline and 5% albumin infusions in cardiac surgical patients

期刊

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 2299-2302

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00011

关键词

sodium chloride; albumins; colloids; fluid therapy; cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; plasma volume; extracellular space

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the relative distribution of fluid within the extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) and the effect on oxygen delivery after infusing either normal saline or 5% albumin in cardiac surgical patients. Design. Prospective, randomized, unblinded, interventional study. Setting: Cardiac surgical intensive care unit in a 450-bed teaching hospital. Patients: Postoperative cardiac surgical patients (n = 40). Interventions. Infusion of either normal saline or 5% albumin to a hemodynamic end point determined by the patient's clinician. Measurements and Main Results. Plasma volume (PV), ECFV, cardiac index, and arterial oxygen content were measured immediately before (baseline) and after each fluid infusion. PV and ECFV were measured by dilution of I-131-albumin and [S-35]sodium sulfate, respectively. Interstitial fluid volume (ISFV) was calculated as ECFV - PV. Baseline values for PV, ISFV, ECFV, and oxygen delivery index did not differ between treatment groups. Infusion of normal saline and 5% albumin increased PV by 9 +/- 23% and 52 +/- 84% of the volume infused, respectively (p < .05), whereas there was no significant difference between saline and albumin in the change in ISFV per volume infused. Only 5% albumin significantly increased cardiac index, although oxygen delivery did not change significantly after either infusion. Conclusions: In postoperative cardiac surgical patients, infusion of 5% albumin is approximately five times as efficient as a PV expander but has comparable effects on changes in ISFV and oxygen delivery relative to normal saline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据