4.7 Article

Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 235-244

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004

关键词

Construction methods; Prefabrication; Concrete construction; Construction management; Sustainable development

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of prefabrication offers significant advantages, yet appropriate criteria for applicability assessments to a given building have been found to be deficient. Decisions to use prefabrication are still largely based on anecdotal evidence or simply cost-based evaluation when comparing various construction methods. Holistic criteria are needed to assist with the selection of an appropriate construction method in concrete buildings during early project stages. Following a thorough literature review and comprehensive comparisons between prefabrication and on-site construction method, a total of 33 sustainable performance criteria (SPC) based on the triple bottom line and the requirements of different project stakeholders were identified. A survey of U.S. experienced practitioners including clients/developers, engineers, contractors, and precast concrete manufacturers was conducted to capture their perceptions on the importance of the criteria. The ranking analysis of survey results shows that social awareness and environmental concerns were considered as increasingly important in construction method selections. Factor analysis reveals that these SPCs can be grouped into seven dimensions, namely, economic factors: long-term cost, constructability, quality, and first cost; social factors: impact on health and community, architectural impact: and environmental factor: environmental impact. The resultant list of SPCs provides team members a new way to select a construction method, thereby facilitating the sustainable development of built environment. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据