4.5 Article

Predictors of maternal child-feeding style: maternal and child characteristics

期刊

APPETITE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 231-243

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0427

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD032973-05, R01 HD032973] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated relationships among maternal and child characteristics. and two aspects of maternal child-feeding styles that may place daughters at risk for developing problems with energy balance, Participants included 104 overweight (BMI greater than or equal to 25) and 92 non-overweight (BMI < 25) mothers and their 5-year-old. non-Hispanic, White daughters, Child-Feeding styles included (a) restriction of daughters' intake of energy-dense snack food, and (b) pressure to cat more food. Predictors of child-feeding styles included measures of (1) maternal investment in weight and eating issues. including dietary restraint and weight concern., (2) child adiposity, (3) maternal perceptions of the child as underweight or overweight, and (4) maternal concern for child weight. Mothers reported using more restrictive feeding practices when they were invested in weight and eating issues, when they perceived daughters as overweight, when they were concerned about daughters' weight, and when daughters were heavier. Mothers reported using more pressure in child feeding when daughters were thinner, and when mothers perceived daughters as underweight. Further analyses examined whether relationships among child-feeding styles were different for overweight and non-overweight mothers. Overweight mothers' child-feeding styles appeared to be influenced by observable child weight characteristics, concerns for the child's weight status, and mothers' own history of overweight. Non-overweight mothers' child-feeding styles appeared to be influenced by distorted perceptions of and concerns for children, as well as distorted self-perceptions. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据