4.8 Article

Reduction of signal suppression effects in ESI-MS using a nanosplitting device

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 73, 期 23, 页码 5635-5644

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac010501i

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1R01CA69390] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry is a valuable tool in the identification and quantification of drug metabolites in biological fluids. However, there are many instances where matrix components present in these fluids interfere with analyte detection and prevent the acquisition of accurate or complete results. In some instances, the matrix can suppress ionization to such an extent that analytes are completely undetectable by MS. In this work, we investigate how ionization and ion-transfer efficiencies are affected by drastically reducing the flow into the MS. A postcolumn concentric flow-splitting device was constructed to allow the measurement of analyte signal and ionization suppression across a range of flow rates (0.1-200 muL/min). Using this device, the effects of flow rate on signal intensity and ionization suppression were measured in analytical experiments that included flow injection analysis MS, postcolumn addition LC-MS, and on-line LC-MS analysis of metabolites generated from rat liver microsomes. The device used to deliver 0.1 muL/min flows is referred to as a nanosplitter because it achieved high split ratios (2000: 1), producing flow rates comparable to those observed in nanoelectrospray. The nanosplitter maintained chromatographic integrity with high fidelity and allowed the direct comparison of analyte signal across a range of flow rates (0.1-200 muL/min). A significant improvement in concentration and mass sensitivity as well as a reduction in signal suppression is observed when the performance at 200 versus 0.1 muL/min flow rate is compared. Using this specially designed concentric splitting device, the advantages of ultralow flow ESI were easily exploited for applications employing large bore chromatography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据