4.5 Article

Alterations in behaviour and glutamate transmission following presentation of stimuli previously associated with cocaine exposure

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 1843-1855

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01804.x

关键词

AMPA receptors; conditioning; microdialysis; nucleus accumbens; rat

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 06058, DA 09621, DA 00453, DA 13006] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the role of glutamate in cocaine-conditioned responses, we developed a rat model in which conditioned locomotion is produced by repeated pairing of cocaine with discrete stimuli (flashing light and metronome). 'Paired' subjects received cocaine (15 mg/kg) prior to six exposures to stimuli for 30 min in the test environment. 'Unpaired' subjects received equivalent presentations of the stimuli yet received cocaine in home cages. Tests with the stimuli alone demonstrated that the conditioned locomotion displayed by Paired subjects was evident at 3 or 10 days post-training and resistant to two sessions of testing. The degree of conditioned locomotion was not correlated with the subjects' response to novelty or cocaine. Administration of the noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 (2.5 mg/kg, a dose without effect on spontaneous activity) attenuated the expression of conditioned activity. In vivo microdialysis revealed that Paired subjects had significantly lower basal glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) than did Unpaired subjects when no stimuli were presented. Presentation of the conditioned stimuli resulted in significant increases in glutamate levels in the NAc in the Paired group whilst glutamate levels in the Unpaired group remained unchanged. The associative control of glutamate levels in the NAc by stimuli formerly paired with a drug of abuse is an unprecedented finding. It is likely to reflect the convergence of excitatory inputs that the NAc receives from limbic structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据