4.7 Article

Activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors protect human skin from ultraviolet-B-light-induced inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 117, 期 6, 页码 1430-1436

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01537.x

关键词

erythema; irradiation; PPAR; WY-14,643

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) are members of a nuclear receptor superfatnily, which were initially described in the context of fatty acid degradation and adipocyte differentiation. In this study we tested the hypothesis that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activation also controls inflammation. In an in vitro model with human keratinocytes inflammation was mimicked by irradiation with ultraviolet B light (150 mJ per cm(2)). Activators for PPAR-alpha (WY-14,643, clofibrate) were shown to reverse ultraviolet-B-light-mediated expression of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-8). An activator preferentially for PPAR-beta (bezafibrate) did not show prominent effects on interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 expression. The antiinflammatory action of WY-14,643 on skin cells was further demonstrated by in vivo testings in which topically applied WY-14,643 markedly increased the minimal erythema dose in ultraviolet-B-irradiated skin. Additionally, it was shown that ultraviolet B irradiation led to a decrease of all three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor subsets at the mRNA level. Also transactivation of peroxisome proliferator response element was attenuated by ultraviolet B irradiation. The downregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by ultraviolet B irradiation provides a possible mechanism that leads to exaggerated and prolonged inflammation. This work suggests the possibility of PPAR-alpha activators as novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the topical treatment of common inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and photodermatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据