4.6 Article

Mitral valve prolapse and mitral regurgitation are common in patients with polycystic kidney disease type 1

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 1208-1216

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.29216

关键词

adult polycystic kidney disease (PKD); cardiac valvular abnormalities; mitral valve prolapse; mitral regurgitation; aortic regurgitation; left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) have an increased occurrence of cardiac valve abnormalities. However, the prevalence of cardiac abnormalities in patients with a uniform genotype of ADPKD has not been previously reported. We performed M-mode and color Doppler echocardiography on 109 patients from 16 families with polycystic kidney disease type 1 (PKD1). Findings were compared with those of 73 unaffected family members and 73 healthy controls. Mitral valve prolapse was found in 26% of patients with PKD1, 14% of unaffected relatives, and 10% of control subjects. The prevalence of hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (grade 2 or 3) was 13%, 4%, and 3%, respectively. Prevalences of grade 2 or 3 aortic regurgitation (8%, 4%, and 3%, respectively) and tricuspid regurgitation (4%, 6%, and 7%, respectively) were not significantly different among the three groups. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was found in 19% of subjects with PKD1, 6% of unaffected relatives, and 4% of control subjects. Systolic blood pressure and severity of renal insufficiency were related to mitral regurgitation and LVH in subjects with PKD1. The prevalence of cardiac valve abnormalities did not differ between unaffected relatives and control subjects. Mitral valve prolapse is a characteristic finding in patients with PKD1. Conversely, mitral regurgitation and LVH are likely to be secondary to elevated blood pressure in these patients. (C) 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据