4.5 Article

Biexponential model for predicting weight loss after gastric surgery for obesity

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 216-224

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6286

关键词

compartment modeling; biexponential models; obesity surgery; gastric bypass; weight loss; mathematical models; bioimpedance analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Following gastric restrictive surgery, morbidly obese patients rarely achieve their ideal body weight defined by Metropolitan Life tables. The final body weight will depend on the initial body composition because there will be greater weight loss from fat than lean body mass. The purpose of this study was to develop a mathematical model that accurately estimates the rate and extent of weight loss following gastric bypass surgery. Methods. Patients underwent gastric bypass followed by intensive medical therapy and serial bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) body composition measurements. Differential equations were derived to model weight loss. Results. Weight loss in the fat and lean body compartments followed monoexponential decay kinetics with differing rate constants. Total body weight loss (W-T) at time t was W-T = k(f)/(k(f) - k(l)) (W(fo)e(-kft) + Wl(o)e(-klt)), where W-fo and W-lo are the initial fat and lean body masses determined by BIA and k(f) and k(l) are the rate constants for the fat and lean compartments, respectively. Following surgically induced weight loss, kf = 7.61 +/- 1.27 x 10(-2), and k(l) = -0.93 +/- 0.13 x 10(-2), with the ratio of residual sum of the squares to the total sum of the squares of 98.8%. Conclusion. Accurate prediction of weight loss depends on the initial fat and lean compartment mass since each of these loses weight at a different rate and to a different extent. When these effects are accounted for, the total body weight loss can be accurately predicted for any given time following surgery. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据