4.6 Article

Age and origin of the Bulangshan and Mengsong granitoids and their significance for post-collisional tectonics in the Changning-Menglian Paleo-Tethys Orogen

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 656-676

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.05.001

关键词

Zircon U-Pb geochronology; Geochemistry; Nd-Hf isotope; Post-collision; Paleo-Tethys; Sanjiang

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program [2015CB452603, 2009CB421008]
  2. CSC [201406405006]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652013034]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT)
  5. 111 Project [B07011]
  6. Chinese Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The subduction and collision tectonics in the Sanjiang region provide important insights into the evolution of the Paleo-Tethyan Orogen. Here we present LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages, Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf isotopic data, whole-rock major and trace element compositions of the Late Triassic magmatic rocks from the Mengsong and Bulangshan granitoids in this region. Zircon U-Pb dating of the Bulangshan and Mengsong granitoids yields crystallization age of 216-228 Ma, with zircon epsilon Hf(t) values ranging from -15.2 to -1.5. These granitoids are high-K calc-alkaline and muscovite-bearing. The rocks show peraluminous nature, and are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (Rb, K, U, and Th) and depleted in high field strength elements (Nb and Ti). They also display enrichment in light rare earth elements with strong negative Eu anomalies (delta Eu = 0.16). The geochemical and isotopic features suggest that the primary magma of the Bulangshan and Mengsong granitoids most likely originated from partial melting of the underlying Proterozoic metasedimentary rocks. The granitoid magmatism is correlated with post-collisional tectonics, and provides important constraints on the timing of closure of the Paleo-Tethyan Ocean. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据