4.6 Article

Radial color gradients in K plus A galaxies in distant clusters of galaxies

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 122, 期 6, 页码 2913-2922

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/324229

关键词

galaxies : clusters : general; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : starburst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galaxies in rich clusters with z greater than or similar to 0.3 are observed to have a higher fraction of photometrically blue galaxies than their nearby counterparts. This raises the important question of what environmental effects can cause the termination of star formation between z approximate to 0.3 and the present. The star formation may be truncated because of ram pressure stripping, or the gas in the disk may be depleted by an episode of star formation caused by some external perturbation. To help resolve this issue, surface photometry was carried out for a total of 70 early-type galaxies in the cluster Cl 1358+62, at z similar to 0.33, using two-color images from the Hubble archive. The galaxies were divided into two categories based on spectroscopic criteria : 24 are type K + A (e.g., strong Balmer lines, with no visible emission lines), while the remaining 46 are in the control sample, with normal spectra. Radial color profiles were produced to see whether the K + A galaxies show bluer nuclei in relation to their surrounding disks. Specifically, a linear gradient was fitted to the radial color profile of each galaxy. We find that the K + A galaxies on average tend to have slightly bluer gradients toward the center than the normal galaxies. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test has been applied to the two sets of color gradients. The result of the test indicates that there is only a similar to2% probability that the K + A and normal samples are drawn from the same parent distribution. There is a possible complication from a trend in the apparent magnitude-versus-color gradient relation, but overall our results favor the centralized star formation scenario as an important process in the evolution of galaxies in dense clusters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据