4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

High dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate predicts breast cancer progression during new aromatase inhibitor therapy and stimulates breast cancer cell growth in tissue culture: A renewed role for adrenalectomy

期刊

SURGERY
卷 130, 期 6, 页码 947-953

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2001.118378

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Stage IV hormone-sensitive breast cancer is often treated with aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane), which block the conversion of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to estrone and estradiol. This is intended to obviate the need for steroid replacement and antiquate adrenalectomy. Methods. Patients who underwent oophorectomy and were being treated with new aromatase inhibitor therapy received serial measurements of serum estrone, estradiol, and DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S). Steroid values during responsive and progressive phases of disease were compared. In vitro, human breast cancer cell lines T-47D (estrogen-receptor progesterone-receptor positive) and HCC 1937 (estrogen-receptor and progesterone-receptor negative) were treated with DHEA-S. Proliferation rates were measured by colorimetric assay. Results. Disease in 12 of the 19 patients progressed. DHEA-S was less than 89 mug/dL in patients during the responsive phase and more than or equal to 89 mug/dL during disease progression, with 1 exception (P < .0005). Estrone and estradiol remained suppressed. After disease progression, the condition of 9 patients stabilized with aminoglutethimide therapy (n = 8) or adrenalectomy (n = 1), and their DHEA-S levels were reduced to less than 89 mug/dL. In vitro, elevated DHEA-S induced cell proliferation in T-47D cells. Conclusions. DHEA-S levels more than or equal to 89 mug/dL predicted disease progression in states of low estrogen. Tissue culture results supported the role of DHEA-S as an estrogenic agent. Oophorectomies with either aminoglutethimide therapy adrenalectomy were effective remedies for breast cancer progression due to high DHEA-S.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据