4.7 Article

Increased HTLV-I proviral load and preferential expansion of HTLV-I Tax-specific CD8+ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with HAM/TSP

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 807-812

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ana.10065

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, high human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I proviral load in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis has been reported and is thought to be related to the pathogenesis of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis. However, the proviral load in cerebrospinal. fluid has not been well investigated. We measured human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I proviral load in cerebrospinal fluid cells from human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis patients using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan). Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I proviral load in cerebrospinal fluid cells were significantly higher than that of the matched peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and a high ratio of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I proviral load in cerebrospinal fluid cells to peripheral blood mononuclear cells were observed in patients with short duration of illness. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I Tax-specific CD8(+) T cells, as detected by peptide-loaded HLA tetramers, accumulated in cerebrospinal fluid compared with that in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, while the frequency of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T cells in cerebrospinal fluid was reduced. These observations suggest that accumulation of both human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-infected cells and preferential expansion of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-specific CD8(+) cells in cerebrospinal fluid may play a role in the pathogenesis of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据