4.3 Article

Recreational physical activity and risk of papillary thyroid cancer (United States)

期刊

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 881-885

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013757030600

关键词

exercise; physical activity; thyroid neoplasms

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CN-05230, R01 CA52656] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Exercise has been hypothesized to influence cancer risk through a variety of mechanisms including hormonal, metabolic and immunologic effects, yet its relation with the risk of thyroid cancer has not been examined. We conducted a population-based case-control study in women aged 18-64 in three counties of western Washington State to assess the relation of recreational physical activity with risk of papillary thyroid cancer. Methods: Of 558 women with thyroid cancer of the follicular epithelium diagnosed during 1988-1994 who were identified as eligible, 468 (83.9%) were interviewed; this analysis was restricted to women with papillary histology (n = 410). Controls (n = 574) were identified by random digit dialing, with a response proportion of 73.6%. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and associated confidence intervals (CI) estimating the relative risk of papillary thyroid cancer associated with various aspects of recreational exercise. Results: Risk of thyroid cancer was reduced among women who reported that they engaged in regular recreational exercise during the 2 years before diagnosis relative to women who did not report exercise during that time period (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.98). A similar risk reduction was noted among women who reported having exercised regularly between ages 12 and 21 (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.1). However, no clear associations with aspects of recreational activity, including average hours exercised per week or weekly energy expenditure, were observed. Conclusions: These results provide some initial support for the hypothesis that physical activity may reduce risk of thyroid cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据