4.7 Article

Crystallographic and modeling studies of RNase III suggest a mechanism for double-stranded RNA cleavage

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 1225-1236

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00685-2

关键词

RNase III; endonuclease domain; compound active center; dsRNA; RNA processing; RNA interference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Aquifex aeolicus Ribonuclease III (Aa-RNase III) belongs to the family of Mg2(+)-dependent endonucleases that show specificity for double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). RNase III is conserved in all known bacteria and eukaryotes and has 1-2 copies of a 9-residue consensus sequence, known as the RNase III signature motif. The bacterial RNase III proteins are the simplest, consisting of two domains: an N-terminal endonuclease domain, followed by a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD). The three-dimensional structure of the dsRBD in Escherichia coli RNase III has been elucidated; no structural information is available for the endonuclease domain of any RNase III. Results: We present the crystal structures of the Aa-RNase III endonuclease domain in its ligand-free form and in complex with Mn2+. The structures reveal a novel protein fold and suggest a mechanism for dsRNA cleavage. On the basis of structural, genetic, and biological data, we have constructed a hypothetical model of Aa-RNase III in complex with dsRNA and Mg2+ ion, which provides the first glimpse of RNase III in action. Conclusions: The functional Aa-RNase III dimer is formed via mainly hydrophobic interactions, including a ball-and-socket junction that ensures accurate alignment of the two monomers. The fold of the polypeptide chain and its dimerization create a valley with two compound active centers at each end of the valley. The valley can accommodate a dsRNA substrate. Mn2+ binding has significant impact on crystal packing, intermolecular interactions, thermal stability, and the formation of two RNA-cuffing sites within each compound active center.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据