4.7 Article

Mutation in the promoter region of the β-fibrinogen gene and the risk of future myocardial infarction, stroke and venous thrombosis

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 24, 页码 2262-2266

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2692

关键词

beta-fibrinogen promoter gene; myocardial infarction; stroke; venous thrombosis; cardiovascular risk

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL58755] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the beta -fibrinogen gene are associated with increased plasma fibrinogen levels. We investigated whether the distribution of the C148T polymorphism is associated with an increase in cardiovascular risk. Methods and Results In a nested case-control design. the distribution of the C148T pol,morphism was investigated among 751 participants in the Physicians' Health Stud Oo subsequently developed myocardial infarction, stroke or venous thromboembolism (cases) and among 751 age- and smoking-matched controls over follow-up of 8.6 bears. Frequency of the T allele was similar among men who hud myocardial infarction (22.7%. P=0.5). stroke (18.4%, P=0.2) or venous thromboembolism (17.0%, P=0.1) compared with those with no cardiovascular events (21.5%). The relative risk for any vascular event among men homozygous or heterozygous for the T allele compared with men homozygous for the C allele was 0.94 (95% CI 0.70-1.16). We found no evidence of an association bem een the T allele and myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.06; 95% CI 0.82-1.36), stroke (0.87, 0.63-1.21) or venous thromboembolism (0.75: 0.51-1.08). Analysis adjusted for aspirin use and traditional cardiovascular risk factors had no significant effect oil these findings. Conclusion In a large prospective cohort, carriage of the T allele for the C148T Mutation in the beta -Fibrinogen promoter gene was not associated with an increased subsequent risk, of cardiovascular events. (C) 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据