4.6 Article

Sedimentary facies, diatom and foraminifer assemblages in a late Pleistocene-Holocene incised-valley sequence from the Mekong River Delta, Bentre Province, Southern Vietnam: the BT2 core

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 83-94

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-9120(01)00028-1

关键词

Mekong River Delta; diatom; foraminifer; sediment facies; sea-level change

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed description of sediment facies, diatom, mollusca and foraminifer assemblages, and C-14 ages of the Mekong River Delta, Southern Vietnam, is presented in this paper. A 71 m long core, recovered in 1997 at the Bentre province in the eastern part of the Mekong River Delta, is divided into eight units and nine sediment facies on the basis of sedimentary properties, diatom and foraminifer assemblages, and C-14 ages. These units show facies changes from transgression to regression in relation to the late Pleistocene-Holocene sea-level changes. The Postglacial transgression caused by a sea-level rise led to infilling of the incised valley and formation of estuarine sediments and open bay muddy sediments in ascending order. Estuarine sediments consist of slightly oxidized yellowish-grey silty sand and intercalated greenish-grey and stiffly brownish-grey sandy silt and silty clay. The muddy facies, 13.5 m thick, is characterized by abundant marine plank-tonic diatoms and open-sea foraminifers. This facies indicates the maximum Holocene marine influence was around 5300 cal yr BP at the BT2 site. The regressive succession is composed of deltaic sediments from prodelta, delta front, sub- to inter-tidal flat and beach ridge in ascending order. C-14 ages indicate that the delta front passed the core site at approximately 4000-3000 cat yr BP. The coastal progradation rate was 17-18 in yr(-1) during the 5300-3500 cal yr and decreased to 13-14 m yr(-1) during the last 3500 cat yr. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据