4.5 Article

Platelet-derived growth factor-α receptor expression supports the growth of conventional chondrosarcoma and is associated with adverse outcome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1520-1527

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200112000-00008

关键词

chondrosarcoma; platelet-derived growth factor AA; platelet-derived growth factor-alpha receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone cells are important targets of platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs) because they stimulate proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes. In this study we wanted to determine the expression of PDGF-AA and PDGF-alpha receptor in-conventional chondrosarcomas and to compare the results with those obtained from benign enchondromas and non-neoplastic cartilage tissue. Sixty-seven chondrosarcomas, 20 enchondromas, and 5 specimens of healthy cartilage as well as 7 specimens of hypertrophic callus cartilage were immunohistochemically analyzed for the expression of PDGF-AA and PDGF-alpha receptor, respectively. Additionally, the proliferation activity was examined with the MIB-1 antibody. Clinical follow-up data were available from 53 patients. A significant overexpression of receptor and factor was found in chondrosarcomas as compared with enchondromas (PDGF-AA p = 0.013, PDGF-alpha receptor p <0.001). MIB-1 values were significantly higher in chondrosarcomas (p <0.00 1). In healthy joint cartilage no staining was detectable, whereas reactive cartilage of callus formation showed high expression levels. PDGF-alpha receptor expression was significantly higher in grade 3 chondrosarcomas compared with grade 2 (p = 0.022) and grade 1 tumors (p = 0.002). Survival analysis documented a significantly shorter overall survival for patients with high PDGF-a receptor expression (p = 0.0172, log-rank test). Because PDGF-alpha receptor expression positively correlates with the aggressiveness of chondrosarcoma, it may be considered as a possible target for novel therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据