4.5 Article

Thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Use of evoked potential monitoring in 118 patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 1035-1040

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2001.119397

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Paraplegia is the most dreaded and severe complication of surgery on. them descending thoracic aorta (TAA) and thoracoabdominal aorta (TAAA). The functional integrity of the spinal cord can be monitored by means of intraoperative recording of myogenic-evoked responses after transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. In this study, we evaluated the results of evoked potential monitoring and the adequacy of the strategy followed. Method: The spinal cord of 118 patients (78 men; age, 65 +/- 12 years; 79 TAAAs, 39 TAAs) undergoing surgery on the TAA or TAAA was monitored with tcMEP and SEP. Spinal cord protection was achieved by means of a multimodality approach: moderate hypothermia (32 degreesC rectal temperature), continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage to keep the pressure less than 10 mm Hg, reimplantation of intercostal arteries, left ventricular bypass grafting, and staged clamping. In the case of evoked potential changes more than 50% of baseline, the strategy was adjusted: reattachment of more segmental arteries when technically feasible, higher distal and proximal perfusion pressures, and enhanced cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Results: Forty-two of 118 patients (35.6%) had a more than 50% of baseline tcMEP reduction during cross-clamping. At this point, only 5 of those 42 cases were also associated with SEP reduction of more than 50% of baseline. On the basis of the tcMEP findings, the strategy was adjusted. Five patients had postoperative paraplegia (4.2%). Conclusion: tcMEP monitoring seems to be a useful adjunct of the protective techniques and may cause substantial adjustments in strategy, reducing the incidence of postoperative paraplegia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据