4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Environmental and genetic determinants of intima-media thickness of the carotid artery

期刊

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING ASIA
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2001.03576.x

关键词

age; artery; candidate genes; carotid; environmental factors; familial; genetics; polymorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. The aim of the present study was to investigate carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in relation to anthropometric, environmental and genetic factors, as well as cholesterol and blood pressure levels. 2. The study sample was composed of 89 families, with no documented cardiovascular disease, consisting of 369 subjects (aged from 10 to 54 years) from the Stanislas cohort. 3. Carotid intima-media thickness was measured by B-mode ultrasonography. Fifteen genetic markers, including genes involved in lipid metabolism, the regulation of blood pressure, thrombosis, platelet function and endothelial cell adhesion, were studied by multiplex assay. 4. The effects of gender, age, smoking, alcohol, body mass index, cholesterol, blood pressure and genetic factors were studied using ANOVA and bivariate and regression analyses. 5. Segregation analysis was also performed to estimate the contribution of genetic and environmental factors to CIMT variability. 6. Carotid intima-media thickness values were not affected by age or by gender up to 18 years of age. Thereafter, CIMT values increased sharply in men and remained significantly higher than in women. 7. Approximately 30% of CIMT variability was attributable to genetic factors. Associations between CIMT and polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein CIII, cholesteryl ester transfer protein, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase and fibrinogen genes were observed and explained approximately 20% of CIMT variation in men. 8. In women, none of the studied polymorphisms was associated with CIMT variation. 9. Our study gives new perspectives for understanding CIMT variability in healthy middle-aged subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据