4.6 Review

Pathogenesis of Takayasu's arteritis: A 2011 update

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 61-67

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.08.001

关键词

Takayasu arteritis; Vasculitis; Pathogenesis; Immunology; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While our knowledge of the pathogenesis of Takayasu's arteritis (TA) has considerably improved during the last decade, the exact pathogenic sequence remains to be elucidated. It is now hypothesised that an unknown stimulus triggers the expression of the 65 kDa Heat-shock protein in the aortic tissue which, in turn, induces the Major Histocompatibility Class I Chain-Related A (MICA) on vascular cells. The gamma delta T cells and NK cells expressing NKG2D receptors recognize MICA on vascular smooth muscle cells and release perforin, resulting in acute vascular inflammation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are released and increase the recruitment of mononuclear cells within the vascular wall. T cells infiltrate and recognize one or a few antigens presented by a shared epitope, which is associated with specific major Histocompatibility Complex alleles on the dendritic cells, these latter being activated through Toll-like receptors. Th1 lymphocytes drive the formation of giant cells through the production of interferon-gamma, and activate macrophages with release of VEGF resulting in increased neovascularisation and PDGF, resulting in smooth muscle migration and intimal proliferation. Th17 cells induced by the IL-23 microenvironnement also contribute to vascular lesions through activation of infiltrating neutrophils. Although still controversial, dendritic cells may cooperate with B lymphocytes and trigger the production of anti-endothelial cell auto-antibodies resulting in complement-dependent cytotoxicity against endothelial cells. In a near future, novel drugs specifically designed to target some of the pathogenic mechanisms described above could be expanding the physician's therapeutic arsenal in Takayasu's arteritis. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据