4.6 Article

Metabolic control of T cell activation and death in SLE

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 184-189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.07.041

关键词

Calcium; Glutathione; Lupus; Mitochondria; Nitric oxide

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health and the Central New York Community Foundation [AI 048079, AI 061066, AI 072648]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R01AT004332] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R21AI061066, R01AI072648, R56AI048079, R01AI048079] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK049221] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by abnormal T cell activation and death, processes which are crucially dependent on the controlled production of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) and of ATP in mitochondria. The mitochondrial transmembrane potential (Delta psi(m)) has conclusively emerged as a critical checkpoint of ATP synthesis and cell death. Lupus T cells exhibit persistent elevation of Delta psi(m). or mitochondrial hyperpolarization (MHP) as well as depletion of ATP and glutathione which decrease activation-induced apoptosis and instead predispose T cells for necrosis, thus stimulating inflammation in SLE. NO-induced mitochondrial biogenesis in normal T cells accelerates the rapid phase and reduces the plateau of Ca2+ influx upon CD3/CD28 co-stimulation, thus mimicking the Ca2+ signaling profile of lupus T cells. Treatment of SLE patients with rapamycin improves disease activity, normalizes CD3/CD28-induced Ca2+ fluxing but fails to affect MHP, suggesting that altered Ca2+ fluxing is downstream or independent of mitochondrial dysfunction. Understanding the molecular basis and consequences of MHP is essential for controlling T cell activation and death signaling in SLE. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据