4.0 Article

Sutureless aortic valve replacement using a novel autologous tissue heart valve with stent (stent biovalve): proof of concept

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 185-190

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10047-015-0817-1

关键词

Tissue engineered heart valve; Autologous tissue; Aortic valve; Aortic valve replacement; Sutureless valve

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293314, 15H04940, 26670622, 25670603] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed an autologous, trileaflet tissue valve (biovalve) using in-body tissue architecture technology to overcome the disadvantages of current bioprosthetic valves. We designed a novel biovalve with a balloon-expandable stent: the stent biovalve (SBV). This study evaluated the technical feasibility of sutureless aortic valve replacement using the SBV in an orthotopic position, as well as the functionality of the SBV under systemic circulation, in an acute experimental goat model. Three adult goats (54.5-56.1 kg) underwent sutureless AVR under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The technical feasibility and functionality of the SBVs were assessed using angiography, pressure catheterization, and two-dimensional echocardiography. The sutureless AVR was successful in all goats, and all animals could be weaned off CPB. The mean aortic cross-clamp time was 45 min. Angiogram, after weaning the animals off CPB, showed less than mild paravalvular leakage and central leakage was not detected in any of the goats. The mean peak-to-peak pressure gradient was 6.3 +/- A 5.0 mmHg. Epicardial two-dimensional echocardiograms showed smooth leaflet movement, including adequate closed positions with good coaptation; the open position demonstrated a large orifice area (average aortic valve area 2.4 +/- A 0.1 cm(2)). Sutureless AVR, using SBVs, was feasible in a goat model. The early valvular functionalities of the SBV were sufficient; future long-term experiments are needed to evaluate its durability and histological regeneration potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据