4.4 Article

Analysis of early region 1 of porcine adenovirus type 3

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 291, 期 1, 页码 68-76

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.1219

关键词

porcine adenovirus-3; E1A; E1B(small); E1B(large); PAV-3 vector

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify the proteins encoded by the porcine adenovirus 3 (PAV-3) E1 region, rabbit antisera were prepared using a bacterial fusion protein encoding E1A, E1B(small), or E1B(large) protein. Sera against E1A, E1B(small), and E1B(large) immunoprecipitated a protein of 35, 23, and 53 kDa, respectively, in in vitro translated and transcribed mRNA and PAV-3 infected cells. To determine the role of E1 proteins in PAV-3 replication, we constructed vectors with a deletion(s) in the El region. Mutant PAV211, containing deletions in E1A and E3, grew to titers similar to wild-type in VIDO R1 cells (E1A complementing) but not in swine testicular (ST) cells. No early protein (E1B(small), DNA binding protein) expression could be detected in PAV211 infected ST cells by Western blots. Mutant PAV212, containing deletions in E1B(small) and E3, grew to wild-type titers in VIDO R1 or ST cells. These deletions were successfully rescued, resulting in recombinant PAV214, containing deletions in E1A, E1B(small), and E3. However, mutant PAV-3, containing a triple stop codon inserted in the E1B(large) coding sequence, could not be isolated. Next, we constructed a recombinant PAV216 by inserting the green fluorescent protein gene flanked by a promoter and a poly(A) in the E1A region of the PAV214 genome. Both PAV214 and PAV216 replicate as efficiently as wild-type in VIDO RI cells. These results suggested that (a) El A is essential for virus replication and is required for the activation of other PAV-3 early genes, (b) E1B(small) is not essential for replication of PAV-3, and (c) E1B(large) is essential for virus replication. Moreover, the PAV216 vector can be used for the expression of a transgene. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据