4.3 Article

Lower proportions of CD4+CD25high and CD4+FoxP3, but not CD4+CD25+CD127low FoxP3+T cell levels in children with autoimmune thyroid diseases

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 222-230

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/08916934.2012.751981

关键词

Tregs; Graves' disease; Hashimoto's thyroiditis; children

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The essence of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is loss of tolerance of own tissues caused by malfunction of T lymphocytes, which affects the production of antibodies reacting with particular cell structures and tissues. Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) take part in the regulation of immune response and play a leading role in developing immune tolerance through active suppression. The aim of the study was to estimate the expression of CD4 + CD25(high), CD4 + CD25 + CD127(low) FoxP3(+) and CD4 + FoxP3 T cells in patients with Graves' disease (GD) (n = 24, median age 15.5 years), in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) (n = 30, median age 15 years) in comparison with sex-and age-matched healthy control subjects (n = 30, median age 15 years). Polychromatic flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) cytometer was applied to delineate T regulatory cell populations. In untreated patients with Graves' disease and HT we observed a significant decrease in CD4 + FoxP3 (p < 0.001, p < 0.01) and CD4 + CD25(high) (p < 0.016, p < 0.048) T lymphocytes as compared to the healthy control subjects. After 6-12 months of L-thyroxine therapy in HT cases these phenotypes of Tregs were normalized, yet no such changes were observed during GD therapy. The analysis of CD4 + CD25 + CD127(low) FoxP3(+)T cells in the peripheral blood revealed comparable percentages of these cells in patients with thyroid autoimmune diseases to the controls. We conclude that the reduction number of Tregs with CD4 + CD25(high) and CD4 + FoxP3 phenotype suggests their role in initiation and development of autoimmune process in thyroid disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据