4.7 Article

Mortality and causes of death after first ischemic stroke - The northern Manhattan stroke study

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 2000-2005

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.11.2000

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [2 M01 RR00645] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS 27517, R01 NS 29992] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze the early and long-term causes of death after first ischemic stroke in the multiethnic northern Manhattan community. Methods: In the prospective, population-based Northern Manhattan Stroke Study, 980 patients with first ischemic stroke (mean age 70 years; 56% women; 49% Caribbean Hispanic, 31% black, 20% white) were followed for a mean of 3 years. Causes of death were classified as vascular (incident stroke, recurrent stroke, cardiac) or nonvascular. Life table analyses were used to assess mortality risks among different race-ethnic groups. Early (less than or equal to1 month) vs long-term (>1 month to 5 years) causes of death were compared. Results: Among the 980 patients followed, 278 (28%) died; 47 (5%) died during the first month. Cumulative mortality risk was 5% at 1 month, 16% after 1 year, 29% after 3 years, and 41% after 5 years. The proportion of vascular deaths among all deaths was 75% at 1 month and 43% thereafter (p = 0.001). Stroke, either incident (53%) or recurrent (4%), caused early deaths in 57% and long-term deaths in 14% (p = 0.001). Overall mortality risks did not differ significantly among race-ethnic groups. However, the proportion of incident stroke-related early deaths was 85% in Caribbean Hispanic patients, 33% in white patients, and 25% in black patients (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Among patients with first ischemic stroke, incident stroke is the leading cause of early deaths. A large proportion of long-term deaths are nonvascular in origin. Despite similar overall mortality rates in race-ethnic groups, our data suggest a higher incident stroke-related early mortality among Caribbean Hispanics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据