4.7 Article

Cooling rates of molecular clouds based on numerical magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and non-LTE radiative transfer

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 563, 期 2, 页码 853-866

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/323952

关键词

ISM : clouds; ISM : molecules; ISM : structure; MHD; radiative transfer; radio lines : ISM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have computed line-emission cooling rates for the main cooling species in models of interstellar molecular clouds. The models are based on numerical simulations of supersonic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence. Non-LTE radiative transfer calculations have been performed to properly account for the complex density and velocity structures in the MHD simulations. Three models are used. Two of the models are based on MHD simulations with different magnetic field strength (one model is super- Alfvenic, while the other has equipartition of magnetic and kinetic energy). The third model includes the computation of self-gravity (in the super-Alfvenic regime of turbulence). The density and velocity fields in the simulations are determined self-consistently by the dynamics of supersonic turbulence. The models are intended to represent molecular clouds with linear size L approximate to 6 pc and mean density (n) approximate to 300 cm(-3), with the density exceeding 10(4) cm(-3) in the densest cores. We present (CO)-C-12, (CO)-C-13, (CO)-O-18, O-2, O I, C I, and H2O cooling rates in isothermal clouds with kinetic temperatures 10-80 K. Analytical approximations are derived for the cooling rates. The inhomogeneity of the models reduces photon trapping and enhances the cooling in the densest parts of the clouds. Compared with earlier models, the cooling rates are less affected by optical depth effects. The main effects come, however, from the density variation, since cooling efficiency increases with density. This is very important for the cooling of the clouds as a whole, since most cooling is provided by gas with density above the average.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据