4.7 Article

Outcome of children with fetal, neonatal or childhood diagnosis of isolated congenital atrioventricular block - A single institution's experience of 30 years

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01697-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We reviewed our institution's experience with isolated (congenital) third-degree atrioventricular block (CAVB) to identify pre- and post-natal predictors of mortality and the requirement for pacemakers in infancy and childhood. BACKGROUND Because of the relative rarity of the disease, there is a paucity of data concerning the outcome of fetuses and children with isolated CAVB. METHODS The medical records of all cases of CAVB encountered at our institution from January 1965 to December 1998 were analyzed. RESULTS Of 102 cases identified, 29 were diagnosed in utero (F) at 26.1 +/- 5.6 weeks gestation, 33 as neonates (N; less than or equal to 28 days), and 40 as children (C) at 5.7 +/- 4.8 years of age. Anti-Ro and/or anti-La were present in 95% of F and 90% of N, but only in 5% of C mothers tested (p < 0.0001). Patients with CAVB having F, N and C diagnosis had a mortality of 43%, 6% and 0%, respectively, in the first two decades of life. Increased mortality risk was associated with a fetal diagnosis of CAVB (13/15 deaths; p < 0.05), fetal hydrops (6/6 cases; p < 0.0001), endocardial fibroelastosis (5/5 cases; p < 0.0001) and delivery at less than or equal to 32 weeks (4/6 cases; p < 0.05). Timing of pacemaker implantation differed significantly among F versus N (p < 0.05) and N versus C (p < 0.001) cases. At 20 years of age only 11% and 12% of CAVB patients with N and C diagnosis, respectively, were not paced. CONCLUSIONS Pre-natal diagnosis of CAVB is associated with high fetal and neonatal mortality. Among survivors, whether the diagnosis is made before or after birth, most undergo pacemaker implantation by adulthood, with earlier intervention and a significantly greater need for reintervention among those diagnosed in utero. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:130-7) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据