4.8 Article

Over-expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein-1 (IGFBP-rP1/mac25) in the M12 prostate cancer cell line alters tumor growth by a delay in G1 and cyclin A associated apoptosis

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 140-147

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205021

关键词

IGFBP-rP1/mac25; prostate cancer; cell cycle; apoptosis; G1 delay

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK52683] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we examined the effects of overexpression of the potential tumor suppressor gene IGFBP-rP1/mac25 on cell-cycle kinetics in prostate cancer cells. The majority of the high expressing IGFBP-rP1/mac25 cell population was located in the GI and sub-G0/G1 peaks; synchronizing cells in G2/M with nocodazole demonstrated the high expressing IGFBP-rP1/mac25 clones were delayed in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Unscheduled expression of cyclin A in the sub-G0/G1 peak occurred in the IGFBP-rp1/mac25 clones. Immunoblots showed decreased cyclin DI and p21 and increased cyclin E, p16, and p27 in the high expressing IGFBP-rP1/mac25 clones compared to the control cells. Cyclin D1/cdk-4,6 and cyclin E/cdk-2 kinase activities decreased but cyclin A/cdk-2 kinase activity increased for the high expressing IGFBP-rP1/mac25 clones compared to control cells. A pRb immunoprecipitation demonstrated more binding of E2F-1 to pRb in the high expressing IGFBP-rP1/mac25 clones than in control cells. Finally, cell senescence, as assessed by senescence-associated beta -galactosidase, demonstrated significantly more staining in the IGFBP-rP1/mac25 cells than control cells. These results suggest that IGFBP-rP1/mac25 alters the cell cycle kinetics of the M12 prostate cell line by delaying the cells in the GI phase of the cell cycle. In addition, the appearance of cyclin A in the sub-G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and the increased kinase activity of cyclin A/cdk-2 in the IGFBP-rP1/mac25 clones suggests that cyclin A is associated with the apoptotic cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据