4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities preceding the hemolytic-uremic syndrome

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 346, 期 1, 页码 23-32

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC/NEJM
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa011033

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1RO1DK52081] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The hemolytic-uremic syndrome is a thrombotic complication of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection. It is not known whether the coagulation abnormalities precede, and potentially cause, this disorder. Methods: In 53 children infected with E. coli O157:H7, we measured a panel of markers indicating activation of the clotting cascade and renal function within four days after the onset of illness. These markers were measured again in as many as possible of the 16 children in whom the hemolytic-uremic syndrome developed. Results: The children in whom the hemolytic-uremic syndrome subsequently developed had significantly higher median plasma concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1+2, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigen, t-PA-plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) complex, and d-dimer than children with uncomplicated infection. These abnormalities preceded the development of azotemia and thrombocytopenia. When the hemolytic-uremic syndrome developed, the urinary concentrations of beta(2)-microglobulin and N-acetyl-beta -glucosaminidase rose significantly (P=0.03 for both increases); the plasma concentrations of t-PA antigen, t-PA-PAI-1 complex, d-dimer, and plasmin-antiplasmin complex also increased significantly. The concentration of t-PA antigen correlated with that of the t-PA-PAI-1 complex in a linear regression model (squared correlation coefficient, 0.80; P<0.001). Conclusions: In the hemolytic-uremic syndrome, thrombin generation (probably due to accelerated thrombogenesis) and inhibition of fibrinolysis precede renal injury and may be the cause of such injury. (N Engl J Med 2002;346:23-32.) Copyright (C) 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据