4.5 Article

Apolipoprotein E modulates Alzheimer's Aβ(1-42)-induced oxidative damage to synaptosomes in an allele-specific manner

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 924, 期 1, 页码 90-97

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03228-0

关键词

apolipoprotein E; oxidative stress; beta-amyloid; protein oxidation; lipid peroxidatiom; 4-hydroxynonenal; electron paramagnetic resonance

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-12423, AG-10836, AG-12981, AG-05119] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-32221] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several functional differences have been reported among the three human e2, e3. and e4 alleles of apolipoprotein E (apoE). One functional difference lies in the antioxidant potential of these alleles; e4 has the poorest potential. Interestingly, e4 also correlates with increased oxidative damage in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain, which may explain why the inheritance of the e4 allele is a risk factor for the onset of AD. Beta-amyloid (A(3) is also intimately involved in AD and promotes oxidative damage in vitro; therefore, we have examined the role of the different apoE alleles in modulating Abeta(1-42)-induced oxidation to synaptosomes. Measurement of specific markers of oxidation in synaptosomes isolated from mice that express one of the human apoE alleles indicates that Abeta-induced increases of these markers can be modulated by apoE in an allele-dependent manner (e2>e3>e4). Increases in reactive oxygen species formation and protein and lipid oxidation were always greatest in e4 synaptosomes as compared to e2 and e3 synaptosomes. Our data support the role of apoE as a modulator of Abeta toxicity and, consistent with the antioxidant potentials of the three alleles, Suggest that the e4 allele may not be as effective in this role as the e2 or e3 alleles of apoE. These results are discussed with reference to mechanistic implications for neurodegeneration in the AD brain. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据