4.8 Article

Clinical, genetic, and biophysical characterization of SCN5A mutations associated with atrioventricular conduction block

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 341-346

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc0302.102592

关键词

arrhythmia; bundle-branch block; genetics; long-QT syndrome

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL46681] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD39946] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM56307] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS32387] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Three distinct cardiac arrhythmia disorders, the long-QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and conduction system disease, have been associated with heterozygous mutations in the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel a-subunit gene (SCN5A). We present clinical, genetic, and biophysical features of 2 new SCN5A mutations that result in atrioventricular (AV) conduction block. Methods and Results-SCN5A was used as a candidate gene in 2 children with AV block. Molecular genetic studies revealed G to A transition mutations that resulted in the substitution of serine for glycine (G298S) in the domain I S5-S6 loop and asparagine for aspartic acid (D1595N) within the S3 segment of domain IV. The functional consequences of G298S and D1595N were assessed by whole-cell patch clamp recording of recombinant mutant channels coexpressed with the beta1 subunit in a cultured cell line (tsA201). Both mutations impair fast inactivation but do not exhibit sustained non-inactivating currents. The mutations also reduce sodium current density and enhance slower inactivation components. Action potential simulations predict that this combination of biophysical abnormalities will significantly slow myocardial conduction velocity. Conclusions-A distinct pattern of biophysical abnormalities not previously observed for any other SCN5A mutant have been recognized in association with AV block. These data provide insight into the distinct clinical phenotypes resulting from mutation of a single ion channel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据