4.6 Article

Enzymatic degradation of blends of poly (ε-caprolactone) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) by Pseudomonas lipase

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 868-879

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/app.10084

关键词

enzymatic degradation; biodegradation; blend; poly(epsilon-caprolactone); poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile); surface property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In polymer blends, the composition and microcrystalline structure of the blend near surfaces can be markedly different from the bulk properties. In this study, the enzymatic degradation of poly(epsilon -caprolactone) (PCL) and its blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) was conducted in a phosphate buffer solution containing Pseudomonas lipase, and the degradation behavior was correlated with the surface properties and crystalline microstructure of the blends. The enzymatic degradation preferentially took place at the amorphous part of PCL film. The melt-quenched PCL film with low crystallinity and small lamellar thickness showed a higher degradation rate compared with isothermally crystallized (at 36, 40, and 44 degreesC) PCL films. Also, there was a vast difference in the enzymatic degradation behavior of pure PCL and PCL/SAN blends. The pure PCL showed 100% weight loss in a very short time (i.e., 72 h), whereas the PCL/SAN blend containing just 1% SAN showed similar to 50% weight loss and the degradation ceased, and the blend containing 40% SAN showed almost no weight loss. These results suggest that as degradation proceeds, the nondegradable SAN content increases at the surface of PCL/SAN films and prevents the lipase from attacking the biodegradable PCL chains. This phenomenon was observed even for a very high PCL content in the blend samples. In the blend with low PCL content, the inaccessibility of the amorphous interphase with high SAN content prevented the attack of lipase on the lamellae of PCL. (C) 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc, J Appl Polym Sci 83: 868-879, 2002.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据