4.4 Article

Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome

期刊

AIDS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 269-277

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00017

关键词

antiretroviral therapy; adherence; self-report; questionnaires

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Many questionnaires on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are in use, but the validity of patients' responses has not been tested. The Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory (MASRI) has been developed and tested for its validity against objective measures and treatment outcome. Design: Prospective study comparing questionnaire responses with MEMS TrackCap (MC, a medication event monitoring system), pill count (PC) and plasma HIV viraemia in a publicly funded specialist HIV clinic. Participants: Patients self-medicating antiretroviral therapy who were not cognitively impaired and were able to read and understand English. Results: Mean adherence by MC of the 78 subjects was 92.9% (SE, 1.8%) and by PC 96.8% (SE, 1.4%). Agreement between MC and responses to items about doses missed 1, 2 or 3 days ago was low (kappa = 0.23 (P < 0.03), 0.44 (P < 0.001) and 0.28 (P < 0.01) respectively). This improved when these responses were summated (kappa = 0.46; P < 0.001) and was similar to that for recall of non-adherence over the preceding 2 weeks (kappa = 0,54; P < 0.001). Mean self-reported adherence by visual analogue scale (VAS) over the preceding month was 93.3% (SE, 1.2%). This was strongly associated with both MC (r = 0.63; P < 0.001) and PC (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the strongest association between a MASRI item and MC was for the VAS. Both the 2 week recall and VAS items were inversely associated with viral load (P = 0.01). There was no association between dose timing (measured MC or questionnaire) or 3 day self-report and viral load. Conclusions: The MASRI provides a means of measuring patient adherence that is valid when compared with objective measures. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据