4.5 Article

Aging has a complex effect on a rat model of ischemic stroke

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 925, 期 2, 页码 148-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)03270-X

关键词

focal brain ischemia; rat; microsphere; rat stroke model; Morris water maze

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stroke in humans is usually associated with advanced age. Nevertheless, almost all animal models of ischemic stroke are based on young animals. The present study was designed to assess the effect of age on the development of ischemic injury in a model of focal brain ischemia in rats. Two age groups of Wistar rats were used: young adult (3 months) and old (24-26 months). Under halothane anesthesia, polyethylene microspheres (50 mum in diameter) were injected into the left common carotid artery following a temporary occlusion of the external carotid artery. Sham-operated rats underwent the same procedure but were injected with an identical volume (100 mul) of saline only. Rats of both experimental groups displayed neurological impairment after surgery. However, contrary to expectation, the young rats were more affected than the old rats. Young rats displayed an abrupt 30% decrement in neurological functions in the first week and then showed a partial functional recovery into a 12% decrement from the second week on. Old rats developed the neurological impairment gradually over a 2-week period (6.3% in the first week and 11% in the second week and thereafter). One month later, rats were tested in a water maze task. Again, performance was more impaired in the young ischemic rats than in the old rats. Histological evaluation revealed more extensive neurological damage in young ischemic as compared to old rats. Thus, although increased age has a critical effect on the evolution of the neurological impairment following focal brain ischemia and stroke, its effects in the rat model were more pronounced in the young animals. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据