4.0 Article

Daytime sleepiness and cognitive impairment in the elderly population

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 201-208

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.2.201

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent findings suggest that there may be a relationship between excessive daytime sleepiness (ENDS) and cognitive deficits. This study aims to determine to what extent EDS is predictive of cognitive impairment in an elderly population. Methods: A total of 1026 individuals 60 years or older representative of the general population living in the metropolitan area of Paris, France, were interviewed by telephone using the Sleep-EVAL expert system. To find these individuals, 70 10 randomly selected households were called: 1269 had at least I household member in this age range (participation rate, 80.9%). In addition to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and International Classification of Sleep Disorders diagnoses, the system administered to participants the Psychological General Well-being Schedule, the Cognitive Difficulties Scale (MacNair-R), and an independent living scale. Results: Excessive daytime sleepiness was reported by 13.6% of the sample, with no significant difference among age groups. Compared with nonsleepy participants, those, with EDS were at increased risk of cognitive impairment on all the dimensions of the MacNair-R scale after controlling for age, sex, physical activity, occupation, organic diseases, use, of sleep or anxiety medication, sleep duration, and psychological wellbeing. The odd ratios were 2.1 for attention-concentration deficits, 1.7 for praxis, 2.0 for delayed recall, 2.5 for difficulties in orientation for persons, 2.2 for difficulties in temporal orientation, and 1.8 for prospective memory. Conclusions: Among elderly individuals in the general population, EDS is an important risk factor for cognitive impairment, A complaint of EDS by an elderly patient should. signal the possibility of an underlying cognitive impairment in need of evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据