4.7 Article

Isotopic fractionation between Fe(III) and Fe(II) in aqueous solutions

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 195, 期 1-2, 页码 141-153

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00581-7

关键词

ferric iron; ferrous iron; stable isotopes; oxidation; reduction; fractionation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large equilibrium isotope fractionation occurs between Fe(III) and Fe(II) in very dilute (less than or equal to 22 mM Cl-) aqueous solutions, reflecting significant differences in bonding environments. Separation of Fe(III) and Fe(II) is attained by rapid and complete precipitation of Fe(III) through carbonate addition, followed by separation of supernatant and ferric precipitate: experiments reported here produce an equilibrium Delta(Fe(III)-Fe(II)) = 2.75 +/- 0.15% for Fe-56/Fe-54 at room temperature (22 +/- 2degreesC). The timescales required for attainment of isotopic equilibrium have been determined by parallel isotope tracer experiments using Fe-57-enriched iron, which are best fitted by a second-order rate law, with K = 0. 18 +/- 0.03 s(-1). Based on this rate constant, similar to 15-20% isotopic exchange is estimated to have occurred during Fe(III)-Fe(II) separation, which contributes <0.10%v uncertainty to the equilibrium Delta(Fe(III)-Fe(II)). Under the experimental conditions used in this study, >97% Fe(II) exists as [Fe-II(H2O)(6)](2+), and >82% Fe(III) exists as [Fe-III(H2O)(6)](3+) and [Fe-III(H2O)(6-n)(OH)(n)](3-n); assuming these are the dominant species, the measured Fe isotope fractionation is approximately half that predicted by Schauble et al. [Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65 (2001) 2487-2497] at 20-25degreesC. Although this discrepancy may be due in part to the experimentally unknown isotopic effects of chloride interacting with Fe-hexaquo or Fe-hydroxide complexes, or directly bonded to Fe, there still appears to be at this stage a > 1% difference between prediction and experiment. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据