4.5 Article

Management of Helicobacter pylori eradication -: the influence of structured counselling and follow-up

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 163-171

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01531.x

关键词

H. pylori; patient counselling; peptic ulcer disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rate varies according to the treatment regimen used and other factors, e.g. antimicrobial resistance and patient compliance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of patient counselling and follow-up on H. pylori eradication rates and to document the effectiveness of a 1 week eradication regimen consisting of lansoprazole (30 mg once daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily). Methods Seventy-six dyspeptic patients, who at endoscopy were found to have gastritis, duodenitis or ulceration, and a positive H. pylori urease test, were recruited, Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 38) or a control group (n = 38). Intervention patients received their medicines via the hospital pharmacy and were counselled (and followed up) by a hospital pharmacist. Control patients were given a standard advice sheet and referred to their GP who prescribed the same therapy. Results Intervention patients exhibited a statistically significant improvement in the H. pylori eradication rate (94.7% vs 73.7%; P = 0.02) and compliance (92.1% vs 23.7; P<0.001). Of the 64 H. pylori eradicated patients, 62 were able to eliminate their antisecretory medication compared with only 12 of the H. pylori persistent patients (P<0.001). A pharmacoeconomic evaluation indicated that counselling and follow-up reduced the direct costs of eradication by approximately, 30 per patient. Conclusions Structured patient counselling and follow-up can have a significant effect on H. pylori eradication rates and should be a routine part of therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据