4.7 Article

Overexpression of C4PEPC caused O2-insensitive photosynthesis in transgenic rice plants

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 257-265

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00572-6

关键词

C3; C4; O-2 insensitivity; PEPC; Pi limitation; transgenic rice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have introduced an intact maize gene for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) into C3 plants, rice (Oryza saliva cv. Kitaake). Most transgenic rice plants showed high-level expression of the maize gene. PEPC was two to three times more active in the leaves of some transgenic plants than in maize leaves. In transformants, the sensitivity of photosynthesis to O-2 inhibition was reduced with the increased activity of the maize C4 PEPC. However, the alleviation of O-2 inhibition was not due to an increase in the partial direct fixation of atmospheric CO2 via the enhanced maize PEPC, but rather due to the reduced stimulation of photosynthesis with a subatmospheric O-2 level. Pi feeding to the leaves restored CO2 assimilation rate under the subatmospheric O-2 condition, and consequently, the O-2 inhibition in the transformants increased to a level comparable to that of the non-transformants. These results suggested that the O-2-insensitive photosynthesis in the PEPC transformants was caused by a Pi limitation of photosynthesis. The activities of two key enzymes for sucrose synthesis, SPS and FBPase, and the sucrose and starch content were reduced in the leaves of the transformants. On the other hand, the dark respiration rate and the malate content in the leaves increased in the transformants. These results indicated that enhanced PEPC activity led to a decrease in the availability of Pi in chloroplast via a reduction of the activities of the key enzymes responsible for Pi recycling and it also caused an increased consumption of the substrate (triose-phosphate) in respiration, but not in sucrose biosynthesis. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据