4.7 Article

Effect of humidity on the response characteristics of luminescent PtOEP thin film optical oxygen sensors

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 94-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00996-0

关键词

optical oxygen sensor; platinum octaethylporphyrin; humidity; ethylcellulose; Stern-Volmer; luminescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steady-state and time-resolved studies have shown that humidity has a significant effect on the sensitivity of luminescent platinum octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP) thin film oxygen sensors when hydrophilic polymers are used as a matrix. When using ethyl cellulose (EC) as the polymer matrix sensitivity is almost halved at 85% relative humidity (RH) as compared to 0% RH. For cellulose acetate butyrate sensitivity is reduced by 14% at 85% RH, while for sensors using silicones, polystyrene (PS) and polyvinylchloride is polymer matrix humidity is not an important factor in sensor response characteristics. The degree of influence humidity has on the sensitivity of films made using hydrophilic polymers can be altered by plasticization, when using EC the humidity dependence can be removed by use of tributylphosphate as plasticizer at a concentration of 40 parts per hundred resin. In the absence of oxygen luminescence decay kinetics can be well fitted to a double exponential curve with 95% of the total luminescence originating from a state with lifetime of 95 mus (similar to that for PtOEP in fluid solution) and 5% from it state with lifetime of 20 mus. However, time-resolved studies of oxygen quenching give data which are inconsistent with a simple dual site model for oxygen quenching of the PtOEP lumophore. The similarity of decay curves under conditions of similar quenching efficiencies at 0 and 85% RH suggest that the effect of humidity lies in changes to the oxygen permeability rather than change in the distribution of lumophore sites in the polymer. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据