4.1 Review

Collaboration between occupational therapists and teachers: Definitions, implementation and efficacy

期刊

AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 209-214

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00934.x

关键词

paediatrics; professional education; school; school teacher; team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The aim of this article is to present a critical review of available health and education literature to ascertain how collaboration is defined, what the barriers to collaboration are, how effective collaboration between occupational therapists and teachers is, and to determine implications for research and future practice in Australia. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search process was undertaken, identifying studies from health and education databases. Manual searching of reference lists was then conducted for retrieved articles. Studies were reviewed to determine quality and relevance to the review question. Results: Nine research articles were reviewed, which included six qualitative and three quantitative articles. An additional seven discussion papers and three literature reviews were also included. It is apparent that the available literature is predominantly written about USA and UK contexts, and empirical evidence is limited. Definitions of collaboration differ, and although professionals agree that it is important to collaborate, the evidence of effectiveness is scant. Conclusions: Although there is much anecdotal desire for collaboration, empirical evidence is limited, but positive. Professionals express desire for collaboration, but the implementation appears inconsistent, and poorly researched. The literature outlines factors, which support collaboration in practice including interactional, organisational and systemic factors. Using this model, strategies for successful collaboration can be formulated. Results indicate a need for research into appropriate models of practice for an Australian context, and particularly for states, where the health and education systems are not well integrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据