4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Role of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in Ca2+ -dependent phospholipid binding by the C2A-domain from synaptotagmin I

期刊

DIABETES
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 S12-S18

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.S12

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 40944] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most C-2-domains bind to phospholipid bilayers as a function of Ca2+. Although phospholipid binding is central for the normal functions of C-2-domain proteins, the precise mechanism of phospholipid binding is unclear. One of the key questions is whether phospholipid binding by C-2-domains is primarily governed by electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions. We have now examined this question for the C(2)A-domain of synaptotagmin I, a membrane protein of secretory vesicles with an essential function in Ca2+-triggered exocytosis. Our results confirm previous data showing that Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding by the synaptotagmin C(2)A-domain is exquisitely sensitive to ionic strength, suggesting an essential role for electrostatic interactions. However, we find that hydrophobic interactions mediated by exposed residues in the Ca2+-binding loops of the C(2)A-domain, in particular methionine 173, are also essential for tight phospholipid binding. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the apparent Ca2+ affinity of the C(2)A-domain is determined not only by electrostatic interactions as shown previously, but also by hydrophobic interactions. Together these data indicate that phospholipid binding by the C(2)A-domain, although triggered by an electrostatic Ca2+-dependent switch, is stabilized by a hydrophobic mechanism. As a result, Ca2+-dependent phospholipid binding proceeds by a multimodal mechanism that mirrors the amphipathic nature of the phospholipid bilayer. The complex phospholipid binding mode of synaptotagmins may be important for its role in regulated exocytosis of secretory granules and synaptic vesicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据