4.4 Article

Factors potentially affecting oviposition site selection by the lady beetle Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 112-119

出版社

ENTOMOL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-31.1.112

关键词

Coleomegilla maculata; Abutilon theophrasti; Acalypha ostryaefolia; Zea mays; oviposition; predation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coleomegilla maculata (DeGeer), a polyphagous lady beetle, is one of the most common predators in corn fields in the eastern United States. Previous work on C. maculata showed an oviposition preference for the weed Acalypha ostryaefolia Riddell (hophornbeam copperleaf), compared with three other weed species and corn. In a separate field study, we found far more C. maculata eggs on Abutilon theophrasti Medic (velvetleaf) than on eight other plant species. Here we report on studies designed to assess the potential roles that prey densities and weed attractiveness may play in the selection of oviposition sites by C. maculata. We also examined diurnal and nocturnal predation of C. maculata eggs on Zea mays L., A. ostryaefolia, A. theophrasti, and Amaranthus hybridus L. (pigweed). We found that C. maculata's choice of plants on which to oviposit was not significantly influenced by the availability of potential prey on those plants. There was no difference in the number of C. maculata adults captured on sticky traps placed over preferred weeds, nonpreferred weeds, or bare soil, suggesting that oviposition choices are made after the beetles land on plants. Coleomegilla maculata egg clusters on A. theophrasti and A. ostryaefolia were preyed upon less frequently than clusters on A. hybridus and corn, indicating that A. theophrasti and A. ostryaefolia provide refuge from predation (including cannibalism) of C. maculata eggs. Unlike the other plant species tested, both A. theophrasti and A. ostryaefolia possess numerous glandular trichomes, which may reduce foraging activity of potential predators of C. maculata eggs on those plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据