4.5 Article

Stimulus satiation: effects of repeated exposure to foods on pleasantness and intake

期刊

APPETITE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 19-28

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0442

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frequent and repeated exposure to foods produces stimulus satiation or monotony. To explore further the nature of stimulus satiation. two experiments were conducted. Experiment I investigated the influence of initial pleasantness and frequency of intake on monotony. Tests showed that bread and butter was eaten more frequently but v.,as liked less than chocolate. Therefore, normal-weight, healthy males ere randomly assigned to either a chocolate condition (CC, N=13) or bread and butter condition (BC, N=16). All subjects received fixed amounts of the assigned food (67 g 1473 kJ of chocolate or 95 g 1355 kJ of bread and butter) every day for 22 days. On days 1. 8. 15 and 22 subjects consumed this food ad libitum. Pleasantness of taste and desire to cat chocolate declined significantly over time but no such changes ,ere observed for bread and butter. Experiment 2 examined intake. pleasantness and desire to cat chocolate in 53 subjects over a 15 day period, with 3 conditions: control (CS: N = 15). fixed (FS: N = 20) and variable (VS: N = 18). CS received no chocolate except on test days (days 1. 8 and 15). FS received 67 g,, 1473 kJ of chocolate daily and VS received increasing amounts of chocolate from 57 g, 1251 kJ on day I to 86 g/1888 kJ by day 12. Pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate declined over time with this being more pronounced for F and V subjects. However, ad libitum intake increased over time. Both experiments demonstrated significant changes in pleasantness and desire to cat chocolate. but no commensurate decline in intake. Thus. although stimulus satiation occurred for subjective ratings of pleasantness and desire to eat chocolate, intake remained unaffected. This apparent dissociation between pleasantness and intake may reflect different processes underlying liking and wanting. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据