4.2 Article

Genotyping of axenic and non-axenic isolates of the genus Prochlorococcus and the OMF-'Synechococcus' clade by size, sequence analysis or RFLP of the Internal Transcribed Spacer of the ribosomal operon

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 453-465

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-453

关键词

Prochlorococcus marinus subsp pastoris PCC 9511(T); cyanobacteria; group-specific ITS primers; oceanic; coastal marine and freshwater 'Synechococcus'; secondary structure of the rrn operon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PCR amplicons of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the rrn operon of three axenic OMF (oceanic, marine and freshwater) strains of 'Synechococcus' (wH7803, PCC 7001 and PCC 6307, respectively) differ greatly in length from that of the axenic Prochlorococcus marinus subsp. pastoris PCC 9511(T), although these four cyanobacteria cluster relatively closely in phylogenetic trees inferred from 165 rRNA gene sequences. The ITSs of three strains (PCC 9511(T), PCC 6307 and PCC 7001) were sequenced and compared with those available for strains Prochlorococcus MED4 (CCMP 1378) and MIT9313 from genome sequencing projects. In spite of large differences in length, sequence and mean DNA base composition, conserved domains important for transcriptional antitermination and folding of the rRNA transcripts were identified in all ITSs. A new group-specific primer permitted ITS amplification even with non-axenic isolates of Prochlorococcus and one OMF-'Synechococcus' strain. Prochlorococcus isolates of the high-light-adapted clade (HL) differed from representatives of the low-light-adapted Glade (LL) by the length of their ITS. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the ITS amplicons revealed three subclusters among the HL strains. Size, sequence data and RFLP of the ITS amplicons will therefore be valuable markers for the identification of different Prochlorococcus genotypes and for their discrimination from other cyanobacterial relatives with which they often co-exist in oceanic ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据