4.7 Article

Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 68-77

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00630.x

关键词

Betula pubescens ssp tortuosa; climate warming; low-alpine; Picea abies; Pinus sylvestris; Sorbus aucuparia; species-limit; upward plant migration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 Recent elevational range-margin performance of tree and shrub species was studied at a site in the Swedish Scandes. The methods included comparisons of historical and present-day range-margin records (in a.s.l.) in conjunction with age-determination of newly established saplings. 2 Since the early 1950s, the range-margins of Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa (mountain birch), Picea abies (Norway spruce), Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine), Sorbus aucuparia (rowan) and Salix spp. (willows) have advanced by 120-375 in to colonize moderate snow-bed communities. The non-native Acer platanoides (Norway maple) has become established just below the birch forest-limit. In concert with tree-limit rises by 100-150 in in the same region, the present results suggest a shift in reproduction and a significant break in the late-Holocene vegetation history. 3 Ring-counting (in 2000) of a subsample of the recovered saplings revealed that, with one exception, they were aged between 7 and 12 years, i.e. they germinated after 1987. Since 1988 there has been strong and consistent winter warming, with some very warm summers, and this may ultimately have forced the vegetational changes. 4 Reduced summer snow-retention has favoured seedling establishment and juvenile growth, and mild winters, with reduced risk of frost-desiccation, have enhanced survivorship and height increment. 5 Certain seed-regenerating tree and shrub species have tracked recent climate change quite rapidly and more sensitively than vegetatively propagating field-layer species. Such species-specific responses may give rise to novel high-elevation vegetational patterns in a hypothetically warmer future world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据