4.8 Article

Detection of dysplastic intestinal adenomas using enzyme-sensing molecular beacons in mice

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 406-414

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.30990

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA88365, N0I-CO97065, P50 CA86355] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Proteases play key roles in the pathogenesis of tumor growth and invasion. This study assesses the expression of cathepsin B in dysplastic adenomatous polyps. Methods: Aged ApC(Min/+) mice served as an experimental model for familial adenomatous polyposis. The 4 experimental groups consisted of (a) animals injected with a novel activatable, cathepsin B sensing near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging probe; (b) animals injected with a nonspecific NIRF; (c) uninjected control animals; and (d) non-ApC(Min/+) mice injected with the cathepsin B probe. Lesions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and optical imaging. Results: Cathepsin B was consistently overexpressed in adenomatous polyps. When mice were injected intravenously with the cathepsin reporter probe, intestinal adenomas became highly fluorescent indicative of high cathepsin B enzyme activity. Even microscopic adenomas were readily detectable by fluorescence, but not light, imaging. The smallest lesion detectable measured 50 mum in diameter. Adenomas in the indocyanine green and/or noninjected group were only barely detectable above the background. Conclusions: The current experimental study shows that cathepsin B is up-regulated in a mouse model of adenomatous polyposis. Cathepsin B activity can be used as a biomarker to readily identify such lesions, particularly when contrasted against normal adjacent mucosa. This detection technology can be adapted to endoscopy or tomographic optical imaging methods for screening of suspicious lesions and potentially for molecular profiling in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据