4.7 Article

Lineage-specific defect in gene expression in human platelet phospholipase C-β2 deficiency

期刊

BLOOD
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 905-911

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V99.3.905

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 56724] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phospholipase C (PLC)-beta2 plays a major role in platelet activation. Previous studies have described a unique patient with impaired receptor-mediated platelet aggregation, secretion, calcium mobilization, and phospholipase C (PLC) activation associated with a selective decrease in platelet PLC-beta2 isozyme. To identify the mechanisms leading to the defect, platelet RNA from the patient and healthy subjects was subjected to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and the products sequenced. The PLC-beta2 cDNA sequence in the patient showed no abnormalities. Platelet PLC-beta2 and beta-actin (internal control) mRNA levels were assessed by RT-PCR; the ratio of PLC-beta2 to beta-actin mRNA levels was 0.80 to 0.95 in 4 healthy subjects and 0.28 in the patient. PLC-beta2 mRNA levels were similarly reduced compared with GPIIb and Galphaq mRNA levels. PLC-gamma2 and platelet factor 4 mRNA levels were normal. Calcium mobilization was studied in neutrophils upon activation with formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), platelet-activating factor (PAF), interleukin-8 (IL-8), C5a, and leukotriene B-4 (LTB4), and it was normal. Neutrophil elastase secretion upon activation with fMLP, ADP, PAF, IL-8, C5a, and LTB4 was normal, as were neutrophil PLC-beta2 mRNA and PLC-beta2 on immunoblotting. Thus, responses to activation, PLC-beta2 protein, and PLC-beta2 mRNA are decreased in patient platelets but not in neutrophils, providing evidence for a hitherto undescribed lineage (platelet)-specific defect in PLC-beta2 gene expression. These studies provide a physiologically relevant model to delineate regulation of PLC-beta2 gene and its tissue-specific expression. (C) 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据