4.5 Article

Survival and development of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes transplanted into adult myocardium

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2001.1491

关键词

cells; myocytes; neonatal cardiomyocytes; transplantation; survival; polymerase chain reaction; development; histology; cardiomyoplasty; rat

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA75090] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01HL152771, R01 HL61488-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transplantation of neonatal cardiomyocytes is a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure and myocardial infarction, but quantitative information on long-term cell survival and development is limited. Male donor cardiomyocytes were isolated from neonatal Fischer 344 rats (1-2 days), purified, and injected into the left ventricular wall of female syngeneic adult rats. One hour to 12 weeks later, genomic DNA was isolated from recipient hearts. The amount of male DNA per sample was determined by quantitative real-time TaqMan PCR of the male-specific Sry gene. Transplanted cell survival was 57 +/- 9% at 0-1 h, 24 +/- 6% at 24 h. 28 +/- 11% at 7 days, 27 +/- 3% at 14 days, 23 +/- 8% at 4 weeks and 15 +/- 3% at 12 weeks, The caspase inhibitor AcYVADcmk failed to improve transplanted cell survival at 24 h, suggesting that apoptosis did not play a major role in cell loss. Histology revealed that transplanted cells became more elongated over time, developed cross-striations, and that their nuclei increased in size, However, at 12 weeks, transplanted cells and their nuclei were still smaller than those of host myocardium. We established a quantitative survival profile for neonatal cardiomyocytes transplanted into normal adult myocardium, There was significant loss of cells within 24 h, but 15% of transplanted cells survived 12 weeks. Those cells that did survive underwent differentiation and developed visible sarcomeres, suggesting a potential contribution toward ventricular function. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据