4.7 Article

Preimplantation exposure to high insulin-like growth factor I concentrations results in increased resorption rates in vivo

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 457-462

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.457

关键词

apoptosis; IGF-I; IGF-IR; mouse model; polycystic ovarian syndrome

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD38061-01A1, R01 HD040390] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK56341] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome suffer increased rates of miscarriage. Elevated insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations have been implicated. Here, we hypothesize that the high concentrations of IGF-I result in miscarriage, represented by decreased normal pregnancy rates and increased resorption rates in a mouse model. Methods: In-vitro studies: 2-cell embryos were cultured in either 1.3 or 130 nmol/l IGF-I; or 500 nmol/l IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) sense and antisense oligoprobes for 72 h. Embryos were then transferred into pseudo-pregnant ICR females. In-vivo studies: IGF-I-containing slow-release pellets or mock pellets were implanted within the uterine horn in ICR female mice. For both studies, the recipient females were killed on day 14.5 and the numbers of normal implantation sites versus resorption sites were recorded. Results: In-vitro studies: blastocysts cultured in low IGF-I exhibited significantly higher normal implantation rates than blastocysts cultured in high IGF-I concentrations (P<0.01). Blastocysts cultured in IGF-IR sense oligoprobes exhibited a significantly higher normal implantation rate than blastocysts cultured in antisense oligoprobes. In-vivo studies: mice implanted with IGF-I-containing pellets exhibited significantly lower normal implantation rates as compared with mock-pellet controls (P<0.01). Conclusions: High preimplantation IGF-I concentrations in vitro or in vivo lead to increased resorption rates in the mouse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据