3.9 Article

Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 3, 页码 201-207

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SR09150

关键词

soil acidification; charge fingerprint; variable charge; organic matter; cation exchange capacity; Papua New Guinea; Andosol; sigmoid function

资金

  1. The Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association (PNGOPRA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calculation of soil acidification rates requires knowledge of pH buffering capacity (pHBC), which is measured using titration methods. The pHBC is often quoted as a single value for a particular soil, implying a linear relationship between pH and the amount of acid or alkali added. However, over its whole range, the relationship is sigmoid rather than linear, and in many soils pH is low or high enough to be outside of the linear range. In this work we fitted a simple sigmoid function to pH buffer curves of 8 tropical Australian soils obtained using one titration method and 58 Papua New Guinean (PNG) soils obtained using another titration method. The function described the curves well for all soils (adjusted r(2) > 0.93 for all samples and >0.99 for 90% of samples), irrespective of the titration method, allowing pHBC to be calculated as a function of pH across the range of pH values established. Using the function, the contribution of variable charge to pHBC was calculated for the PNG soils; on average it was 93% at the pH buffer curves' inflection point, which corresponds with the soil's minimum pHBC. Factors other than variable charge became important at pH (1:5, 0.002 M CaCl(2)) values <4.8 or >6.0. The relationship between pHBC and soil organic matter content was closest at pH 6.0-6.5. Application of the sigmoid function could facilitate more accurate assessments of acidification risks, acidification rates, and potential management interventions, particularly as soils become increasingly acidic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据